RIGGED IN THE NEWS
The system isn’t broken. It’s working exactly as designed. Read what they won’t print—and why it matters now.
Steve Ballmer’s Tariff Talk Skipped the One Bill You'll Pay for Life - 8/11/25
You’ve probably heard the line: “Tariffs just make everything more expensive.”
It’s simple. It’s catchy. It’s also only half true... and the missing half decides how much you actually keep in your pocket. I was reminded of this watching a polished ad from Steve Ballmer — billionaire, former Microsoft CEO, and LA Clippers owner — calmly explaining why tariffs are bad.
He was calm. Professional. Logical. He hit the usual talking points: tariffs make imports pricier, which can raise costs for businesses and consumers. More inflation, fewer choices, everybody loses.
That’s what he said. The problem is what he didn’t say.
1. Tariffs Go Both Ways
Mr. Ballmer conveniently leaves out that other countries have been charging the U.S. steep tariffs for decades while enjoying nearly free access to our markets. Japan slaps huge taxes on American rice and beef. The EU hits our cars with 10% while we only charge them 2.5%. That’s not “free trade.” It’s a one-way street where we pretend to play fair while everyone else plays to win.
2. Tariffs Aren’t the Only Move
He also skipped the part where tariffs are often paired with tax cuts, subsidies, or targeted spending that put money back into communities.
It’s like a price hike with a partial rebate—tough, but not the full hit.
3. Tariffs Can Bring Jobs Home
When imports cost more, some companies move production back to the U.S. or expand existing plants here. In 2018, after tariffs on washing machines, Samsung and LG built new U.S. factories and hired thousands. Short-term? Maybe you pay more for a washer. Long-term? More jobs, more stability, less dependency on unstable supply chains.
The Bigger Play
This isn’t just about prices — it’s about control. Tariffs can raise prices, but they can also protect industries, create jobs, and bring leverage back to the U.S. The trick is in how they’re designed and what policies back them up.
Ballmer knows this. He’s not stupid. He’s also donated over $8 million to political causes that benefit from keeping global labor costs low. This may also explain why his version of the truth leaves out key pages.
Critics focus on the short-term pain. Strategists look at the long-term gain. If you want to see the whole board — not just the half that incentivized "leaders" want you to see — you need to understand both.
This is just one example of the missing truths in today's headlines.
In RIGGED, you'll see the full map of how systems evolved together to keep you paying more and getting less... and how to fight back.
Bonus:
The More Detailed Tariff Takedown
(For Nerds Like Me, Economists, and Anyone Who Wants the Whole Story)
If you’re still here after the short version, you’re either really curious… or really nerdy about trade policy. Either way, welcome.
This is the uncut, full-strength version of my take on Steve Ballmer’s tariff pitch — every missing piece, every example, and every historical curveball.
It’s longer. It’s denser. And it’s exactly the kind of detail that can change how you see the headlines.
What He Said
Ballmer’s talk was calm, logical-sounding, and packed with numbers. I actually liked his professional delivery. He explained how tariffs work, why they can raise prices, and how they affect trade between countries. His main point was simple: tariffs make imported goods more expensive, which means higher costs for consumers and businesses: more inflation.
He didn’t attack or defend any politician. He didn’t sound angry or excited. It was a straight delivery of “the facts”… or at least the facts he chose to include.
The Missing Pieces
It sounded true and accurate on the surface. But here’s the problem: Ballmer, like many other well-known voices with influence (Robert Reich comes to mind), often leaves out key parts of the picture to win you over. Here are a few points he left out that will change how you see the whole tariff story.
1. Reciprocal Tariffs
Ballmer talked about how U.S. tariffs raise prices, but he never mentioned what other countries charge us. Tariffs go both ways — and in many cases, we’re responding to barriers that have been in place for decades.
Think of it like paying a toll to drive into another city, then finding out they’ve been charging you $10 for years while you’ve only charged them $2.
Japan has protected its agriculture market for over 30 years, slamming U.S. rice and beef with steep tariffs while we’ve allowed much easier access for Japanese goods. The European Union’s “3 percent average tariff” hides the fact that some U.S. products face much higher rates — like a 10 percent EU tariff on imported American cars compared to our 2.5 percent on theirs.
And here’s the kicker: the EU wasn’t just a peace project. It was deliberately structured to counter U.S. economic power. By pooling trade policy, the EU negotiates as one block — extracting better terms from partners, including us, than any single European country could. When you hear “EU tariff,” it’s a coordinated strategy to tilt the field in Europe’s favor at America’s expense.
2. Offsets and Policy Trade-offs
Tariffs are sometimes paired with tax relief, subsidies, or targeted spending to offset higher prices. During past steel tariffs, for example, some manufacturers paid more for imports but also received tax cuts or credits that softened the hit. The real question isn’t just whether tariffs raise costs — it’s who pays them: the consumer, the importer, or a mix of both — and whether those costs are outweighed by long-term gains in jobs, investment, and industrial strength.
For all the feel-good talk about income equality, I don’t know what’s more equalizing than an American getting off food stamps, going back to work, and rejoining productive society.
Want the full playbook on how they keep you paying more and getting less?
3. Domestic Gains
When imports get pricier, companies sometimes bring production back to the U.S. or expand existing operations. That means new factories, more jobs, and less dependence on unstable supply chains from countries that may even hate us.
One recent example: after steel tariffs, several U.S. mills restarted dormant operations, rehired workers, and invested in modern equipment. In other sectors, tariffs have helped push high-tech manufacturing — like semiconductor fabs and electric vehicle plants — onto American soil instead of overseas. These moves take time, but they can strengthen communities, boost local economies, and keep critical industries inside our borders — benefits you never hear about when the focus is only on short-term price hikes.
Critics skip over why leadership would even pursue this in the first place, other than “They’re stupid” or “They’re crazy.” Instead, we hear plenty of noise about how Treasury Secretary Bessent and Commerce Secretary Lutnick are idiots. I’d remind people this isn’t their first rodeo — both have strong track records of building success at their own firms, and now they want to apply those same skills to building success for America.
Critical Counterarguments: Second-Order Effects and Historical Lessons
Even if tariffs have benefits, there are risks and “trade war physics” that you can’t ignore. Leaving them out makes the argument sound cleaner than it really is — and critics will seize on that gap.
Retaliatory Escalation
Reciprocal tariffs aren’t always just “leveling the field.” In practice, when one side imposes tariffs, the other may respond with more than an equal measure — not just on the same goods, but on politically sensitive exports. This means a tariff designed to protect, say, American steel jobs, might prompt a foreign government to target unrelated U.S. industries like agriculture or aerospace, purely for political leverage. Example: In 2018, after the U.S. put tariffs on steel and aluminum, China retaliated not only with matching tariffs, but with targeted hits to American soybeans — a direct shot at the Midwest farm vote.
Pass-Through and Price Stickiness
Even when offsets like tax cuts or subsidies are offered, there’s no guarantee they’ll perfectly reach the same consumers who bear the higher prices. Worse, once prices rise due to tariffs, companies often keep them higher even after tariffs are reduced or removed. Economists call this “price stickiness.”
Historical Precedent — Japan’s 1980s “Dirty Float”
In the 1980s, the U.S. faced a massive trade imbalance with Japan. American policymakers accused Japan of using a “dirty float” — manipulating its currency to keep exports cheap and imports expensive — alongside high non-tariff barriers. The U.S. response wasn’t just tariffs; it included the Plaza Accord (forcing yen appreciation) and targeted industry protections. Result: Some U.S. industries, like semiconductors, rebounded in the short term. But Japanese firms adapted by offshoring production to Southeast Asia to dodge tariffs, while still controlling supply chains — a reminder that protectionist measures can be partially evaded by corporate strategy. Lesson: Tariffs can push change, but they rarely operate in isolation. Expect adaptive countermeasures.
Political Leverage
Foreign governments sometimes accept short-term economic pain from tariffs if it weakens an opponent politically. In a democracy, that can mean sustaining tariffs until public opinion turns against the ruling party. The “long game” of trade conflict can easily outlast election cycles. A perfect example of this is when you compare America’s 4-year election cycle to China’s 100-year strategic plan.
Net Assessment
The takeaway for a strategist is this: tariffs are a blunt but useful instrument. They can protect critical industries, force renegotiations, and rebuild domestic capacity — if paired with smart offsets, a long-term plan to reduce dependency, and the political stamina to ride out retaliation. Without that package, they risk becoming just another tax on your own citizens.
4. Political Ties and What's in it for Ballmer?
There’s another piece of the puzzle Ballmer didn’t mention: where his money goes. Nearly all of his major donations — over $8 million, with more than 99% going to Democratic candidates and progressive causes — land on one side of the aisle. That doesn’t make him wrong, but it’s worth knowing when you line up his public messaging against his investments behind the scenes. He advocates lower tariffs while calling for income equality — yet how does he expect to close the gap if American workers are competing with overseas labor that costs a few dollars an hour?
It's also worth asking why a billionaire thought leader would spend his own money to shape public opinion on tariffs. When sentiment swings toward “free trade,” multinational corporations keep supply chains cheap and profits high — a win for shareholder portfolios, including his own. Follow the incentives, and the goal usually isn’t lifting wages here at home. It’s keeping costs low for the corporations that benefit most.
5. The Puzzle Pieces Aren’t Missing
Ballmer is no fool. He’s a highly educated, highly successful businessman who knows the full picture on trade. Yet, like many in his circle, he often gives you only half of the puzzle. By carefully selecting which truths to share, he can guide how you feel about an issue without ever telling you outright what to think. It’s the same soft but powerful method used to shape public opinion — and it works best when it comes from voices that seem calm, reasonable, and above politics.
In Summary: What the Critics Miss
If you spend five minutes online, you’ll hear the same line over and over: “Tariffs just make everything more expensive. Period.”
That’s not wrong — but it’s only half the picture.
Yes, tariffs can raise prices on imported goods. If you’re buying a TV from overseas or a car with foreign parts, you might pay more up front. That’s the part everyone notices — the bill at checkout. But what most people never see is what happens next.
First, tariffs aren’t one-way. Many countries have been charging us steep tariffs for decades while enjoying easy access to our markets. Tariffs can be a way to level the field, not just tax you more.
Second, tariffs are rarely a solo move. They’re often paired with tax cuts, subsidies, or targeted spending that send money back into communities — sometimes directly into the industries that create jobs here at home.
Third, history shows they can shift the balance when the system’s being gamed. In the 1980s, Japan manipulated its currency to keep exports cheap and the U.S. hit back with tariffs, proving that coordinated policy can work.
Finally, smart tariffs can pull production back inside our borders. That means more factories, more jobs, and less dependence on unstable supply chains overseas. It’s a slow burn that rebuilds what decades of “free trade” hollowed out.
Of course, tariffs aren’t a magic bullet. They can trigger retaliation, cause price stickiness, and push competitors to find workarounds. And it’s worth noting — politicians don’t always back tariffs purely for economic strategy. Sometimes, they protect industries that are major campaign donors. A steel mill, farm lobby, or defense contractor might get tariff protection not only because it’s “vital to national security,” but because it writes the checks that keep certain politicians in office.
Paired with smart policy, patience, and political will, tariffs can be a rare tool for shifting an uneven playing field back toward the American worker. But like any tool, they’re only as good as the hands that wield them — and the motives behind the swing.
I’m fascinated by how changes technology, politics, and the economy ripple through our everyday lives — changing what things cost, which jobs survive, and how we build a future worth living in.
If you’re the kind of person who likes connecting the dots too, you've already made a new friend. Take a look at RIGGED — it’s my field guide to spotting the traps, seeing the patterns, and pushing back.